Thursday, July 25, 2013

Who pays for college education? Not Mom and Dad

Who pays for college education? Not Mom and Dad

Published: Tuesday, 23 Jul 2013 | 2:38 PM ET
 
By: | CNBC Senior Commodities Correspondent and Personal Finance Correspondent
















 
 
Mark Gall | Washington Post | Getty Images
A new study finds parents are footing a smaller portion of the college tuition bill as families become more cost-conscious. The burden is shifting to the student, who now has to depend on money from other sources to pay for rising college costs—and many are also finding "free money" to pay for a large chunk of the tab.

According to a report released Tuesday by Sallie Mae, scholarships and grants have trumped parental contributions as the No. 1 source of paying for college for the first time in four years.
Scholarships and grants paid for about 30 percent of college costs in the 2012-2013 academic year, up from 25 percent in 2008-2009, the Sallie Mae study found. Meanwhile, contributions from parental income and savings dropped from 36 percent four years ago to 27 percent today. Student borrowing has risen 4 percent in that time and now covers 18 percent of college costs.

"Student borrowing has leveled off in the past few years, but parent income and savings has come down considerably," said Sarah Ducich, senior vice president for public policy at Sallie Mae. Parents are "just as willing to stretch to pay for college," she says, "but they don't have the money they had prerecession."

Meanwhile, as parental contributions have declined, "college and universities are stepping up," Ducich said. That may also be another factor that has changed who pays for education costs. "The majority of students getting scholarships are getting them from universities and colleges," she says.
Eric Charity got a free ride from Penn State University and he didn't hesitate to take it—even though the school was not his first choice. Charity had dreamed of following in the footsteps of his older brother and cousins, who graduated from Princeton University. But he changed his mind after being offered a full academic scholarship to Penn State.
"When it was my time, my parents really needed some help financially for me to attend school," he says. If he had gone to Princeton or the University of Virginia, his other top choice, Charity says he "would have been in severe debt."
With the university scholarship as well as private scholarship from a local nonprofit, Charity paid for tuition, room and board, fees and other expenses (including a new computer and school supplies) for four years with scholarships. He graduated from Penn State in 2010 and earlier this year got his law degree from William & Mary, which he chose in large part because of cost.

Students and their families are increasingly following Charity's path. "We've seen parents bring their spending down. They're eliminating schools more frequently as they go through the [college selection] process, so that by the end about two-thirds of families have eliminated a school due to cost," Ducich said, referring to Sallie Mae's new report on "How America Pays for College."
As incoming students and their families see recent graduates facing a tough job market, they are also more reticent to spend or borrow great sums of money for college, financial advisors say.
"If your college-educated kids make less money, then you spend less money on their degree," said Ivory Johnson, founder of Delancey Wealth Management. "If you hear stories about degreed friends who are burdened by student loans, then you borrow less money."
Using that lens, more families are choosing colleges and universities based on cost. It's an encouraging trend, Ducich says. "Making the choice that's affordable not just for the first year but the fourth year as well is so important."

Parents pay less of college costs
 
A new study by Sallie Mae digs into just where the funding for college is coming from. CNBC's Hampton Pearson offers insight. 
 
Tips for finding free money for college
  • Sallie Mae, the nation's largest private student loan provider, offers these tips to help students find more scholarships:
  • Start searching for scholarships as early as possible. You can begin as early as ninth or 10th grade, as scholarships for younger students sometimes have less competition. The key is to start early and renew efforts year after year to take advantage of additional opportunities.
  • Sign up for a free online scholarship search service. Sallie Mae's free database lists more than 3 million scholarships worth over $16 billion.
  • Expand your search. Not all scholarships will be found online: check with local clubs, religious organizations, employers and your guidance counselor. Local scholarships tend to be less competitive. Also, corporations often award scholarships to their customers or children of employees.
  • Don't be intimidated by the competition. Scholarship judges look for other qualities such as leadership and volunteerism, and many don't ask for GPA or standardized test scores. Make sure to showcase commitment and depth with involvement in campus clubs or organizations.
  • Don't overlook unusual opportunities. Some organizations offer scholarships to highlight interesting career opportunities, hobbies or products. In fact, there are scholarships such as the Scholar Athlete Milk Mustache of the Year Award and the Stuck at Prom Duck Brand Duck Tape Scholarship Contest.
  • Search year-round. There are many scholarships available all year long, and scholarships due in the winter can have less competition. Treat scholarship searching and applying like a part-time job, as many opportunities come up throughout the year.
  • Watch out for scholarship scams. Scholarship searches should be simple and free to use.

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Why Underemployment May Be Worse Than It Looks

Why Underemployment May Be Worse Than It Looks


Published: Monday, 8 Jul 2013 | 12:21 PM ET
 
By: | CNBC.com Senior Writer
















Getty Images
 
Job seekers wait in line to meet with employers at the 25th Annual CUNY big Apple Job and Internship Fair at the Jacob Javits Convention Center
The level of underemployed workers looks bad on its face but even worse when it's not the government doing the counting.
When the Labor Department released its monthly nonfarm jobs report Friday, it was all sunshine and roses except for one glaring weakness: A big jump in the underemployment rate that includes those who have quit working as well as those who have had to take part-time jobs even though they'd rather work full-time.

That rate, which economists call the U-6, jumped from 13.8 percent in May to 14.3 percent in June—a 3.6 percent increase and indicative that the 195,000 new jobs created in the month weren't exactly of the highest caliber.

But what often doesn't get as much attention is the monthly labor count that the experts at Gallup conduct.


'Wake Up and Smell the Taper': Economist
 
Michael Feroli, JPMorgan Bank, explains why he believes June's employment report will likely lead to the Fed slowing its asset-buying program in September.
According to the pollster's results, the underemployment situation is even worse.
Gallup reports that 17.2 percent of the workforce is underemployed, a startling number compounded by its divergence from the government's count. While the rate is down from the 20.3 percent peak in March 2010, it has remained maddeningly high over the past three years even as economists tout the strength of the U.S. economic recovery.

From a broader perspective, the Gallup measure actually has increased from its 15.9 percent multi-year low in October 2012.


The potential significance of the recent trough is that it came a month before the Federal Reserve launched the third round of quantitative easing, the $85 billion a month bond-buying program that is supposed to help the central bank achieve its dual objectives of price stability—and full employment.
Amid questions of whether QE3 is about to come to end, and if it has been as effective as its predecessors, the underemployment rate will be one important metric to watch.
Aside from the Gallup numbers, the government's report was discouraging in its own right: A jump from 28.5 percent to 29.3 percent for the percentage of those working part-time for economic reasons in the labor force, and a year-over-year surge of 25.1 percent—1.027 million total—for those "discouraged workers" who have quit searching for jobs.

"It's a big deal. The labor market is far from healthy, so I don't want to minimize the fact" that underemployment is on the rise, said Joe LaVorgna, chief U.S. economist at Deutsche Bank.

"To me, it's something that bears watching," he added. "Given the month it occurred, we have tremendous exit and entry into the workforce—teachers and students. You really need to reserve judgment. You need another month or two to see if it's a new trend."
Indeed, some of the other Gallup metrics point to a bit brighter labor picture.
The firm's adjusted unemployment rate, which in the past has diverged substantially from the BLS count, stood at 7.6 percent in June, directly in line with the government's numbers and down substantially from May's 8.2 percent reading.
Also, its payroll-to-population gage was at 44.8 percent, a 2013 high though below the 45.7 percent in late 2012.
But the labor market faces clear pressure ahead, particularly from government sequestration spending cuts and uncertainty over the looming Obamacare implementation.

"We expect labor market pressure from the spending sequester in Washington to spread from reduced hours to job cuts," Ethan Harris, global economist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said in a report for clients.

For now, though, LaVorgna said he is attributing the data point discrepancies to an unusual jobs climate that will out the kinks in the months ahead.

"The labor market is so far from normal that it wouldn't surprise me that all these metrics are not necessarily moving in the same direction," he said. "There's going to be some incongruity between these two series. When things normalize, you would expect these things to rectify themselves."
By CNBC's Jeff Cox. Follow him
on Twitter.

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Gold Bugged: Contrarians Not Ready to Give Up Yet

Gold Bugged: Contrarians Not Ready to Give Up Yet

 
Published: Saturday, 29 Jun 2013 | 7:00 AM ET
 
By: | CNBC.com Senior Writer















AP
 
Gold bugs, meet your falling knife.

With the metal hitting a succession of three-year lows recently, its proponents find themselves trying to catch the proverbial plunging dagger that comes with a collapse in prices.
Yet some traders have yet to give up, believing that gold's demise is nearing its end.


It's part of a broader contrarian view that figures investors are overestimating the factors colluding against precious metals. The bear market in gold has seen a 2013 price drop that approached 30 percent this week, falling below $1,200 for the first time since August 2010.

But gold bugs are a resilient species, and they aren't about to go down easy.
Gartman: Gold Probably 'Seen Its Worse'
 
Dennis Gartman, The Gartman Letter, explains why he is now sitting "on the sidelines" on the gold play, and why he thinks stocks are likely on an upward trend.
"Short gold futures positioning on COMEX is at an all-time high and nearly every broker is now negative gold," analysts at ETF Securities said in a report. "Therefore, while further downside in the short-term is possible, investors with longer-term time-horizons may start to look at the recent sell-off as a longer-term accumulation opportunity."
For most of 2013, though, investors have been running for the exits as fast as their trading platforms can carry them.

The SPDR Gold exchange-traded fund—a highly popular way for investors to get in on the trade without holding physical gold—has seen more than $18 billion in outflows this year, losing nearly 30 percent of its assets under management, according to IndexUniverse.

Some of the recent selling likely was related to fears that the Federal Reserve would begin decelerating the amount of money it was creating to buy bonds. The Fed currently spends $85 billion a month on the quantitative easing program, which has been accompanied by fears of inflation that have yet to materialize. Gold has long been thought of as an effective inflation hedge.
But even when Fed officials on Thursday said QE would not end as long as the economic data remained soft, gold continued to sell off despite a Treasury yield drop.

The gold proponents at ETF Securities say the softening economy will actually help gold prices because it will keep the Fed in the money-printing game.
"If this occurs, the Fed will likely step back from QE reductions. With gold positioning so negative, this has the potential to stimulate a strong short-covering gold price move," the report said.
The team at ETF Securities is not alone in sounding the gold resurgence theme.

Capital Economics predicted that gold will suffer more near-term troubles but "there are also still some plausible scenarios that could lead to explosive gains in the next few years."
MacNeil Curry, technical strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, issued a plaintive "GOLD BEARS BEWARE" warning in a research note, saying proprietary models at his firm suggest a bottom is near.

BofA holds a strongly positive stance on gold, beginning 2013 with a $2,000 price target for year's end and $2,400 for 2014.

Curry said the price is likely to linger around $1,200 an ounce for a while, "but this decline is in its final stages."

A bullish case for gold would be made once the metal cracks $1,270.
However, Curry said in in email that the $2,000 target is no longer valid, though he didn't indicate where the new expectation lies.

"There is almost no way that will happen now," Curry said.

By CNBC's Jeff Cox. Follow him